7 Lingering Questions in the Clinton Email Investigation

THE HILL — The FBI appears to be entering the home stretch of its investigation into Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton’s private email server.

Yet even as arrangements are reportedly being made to interview Clinton and her top aides, much remains unclear.

The FBI under Director James Comey refuses to publicly discuss the investigation, as is customary, but critics say the lingering questions show the review is anything but routine and could result in criminal indictments.

Here’s a look at what is still not publicly known.

When will the investigation end?

The FBI’s investigation had dogged Clinton’s presidential campaign since last summer. The longer it goes, the more likely it is to damage to her chances of winning the Democratic nomination and the White House.

Reports indicate that the bureau is sprinting to complete its work so it won’t be seen as meddling in the presidential election.

Still, according to Clinton, the FBI has yet to reach out to her to schedule an interview, despite reports that she and other top aides could soon be brought in for questioning.

“They haven’t,” Clinton said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” this weekend. “But, you know, back in August, we made clear that I’m happy to answer any questions that anybody might have. And I stand by that.”

What law(s) might have been broken?

Top officials at the FBI and Justice Department have refused to discuss what charges — if any — might result from the investigation.

Speculation about the charges has centered on federal statutes prohibiting against removing federal documents, especially 18 U.S.C. § 2071. A portion of that law bars officials from “willfully and unlawfully” concealing, removing or destroying federal records.

Other laws identified by the watchdog group Cause of Action include prohibitions against removing defense-related information “from its proper place of custody” and against removing classified information to keep “at an unauthorized location.”

Critics also say Clinton or her top aides may have violated internal State Department procedures about handling classified information.

KEY FIGURE IN PETRAEUS CASE SAYS JUSTICE DEPT. WON’T INDICT HILLARY OVER EMAILS — DAILY CALLER

HILLARY WANTS CLINTON FOUNDATION DONOR TO MODERATE NEXT DEBATE AND MSNBC HOST CAN’T BELIEVE IT — DAILY CALLER

UNFAZED BY FBI PROBE, CLINTON ‘ABSOLUTELY CONFIDENT’ SHE’LL BE DEM NOMINEE — TOWNHALL

CLINTON’S EMAILS MAY HAVE BEEN INTERCEPTED DURING ASIA TRIP — WASHINGTON FREE BEACON

FORMER DOJ LAWYER: HILLARY CLINTON SHOULD BE PROSECUTED OVER EMAIL HANDLING — HOT AIR

HILLARY CLINTON: TERRORISTS HAVE RIGHTS, UNBORN CHILDREN DON’T — FPM

Share Button

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *