Can (Should) America Trust Hillary Clinton With US Nuclear Codes, Other Sensitive State Secrets?

Although panicked liberals in the mainstream media and disemboweled members of the Republican establishment have joined forces in trying to portray Republican presumptive nominee Donald Trump as a hot-headed, ill-informed bully lacking the judgment and temperament requisite for serving as Commander-In-Chief, the ongoing criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s performance while Secretary of State poses substantial questions concerning her fitness for high office as well.

Specifically, as reported at the reference:

At the center of a criminal probe involving Hillary Clinton’s handling of classified information is a series of emails between American diplomats in Islamabad and their superiors in Washington about whether to oppose specific drone strikes in Pakistan.

The 2011 and 2012 emails were sent via the “low side’’—government slang for a computer system for unclassified matters—as part of a secret arrangement that gave the State Department more of a voice in whether a Central Intelligence Agency drone strike went ahead, according to congressional and law-enforcement officials briefed on the Federal Bureau of Investigation probe.

Some of the emails were then forwarded by Mrs. Clinton’s aides to her personal email account, which routed them to a server, she kept at her home in suburban New York when she was secretary of state, the officials said. Investigators have raised concerns that Mrs. Clinton’s personal server was less secure than State Department systems.

The vaguely worded messages didn’t mention the “CIA,” “drones” or details about the militant targets, officials said.
The still-secret emails are a key part of the FBI investigation that has long dogged Mrs. Clinton’s campaign, these officials said.

They were written within the often-narrow time frame in which State Department officials had to decide whether or not to object to drone strikes before the CIA pulled the trigger, the officials said.

Law-enforcement and intelligence officials said State Department deliberations about the covert CIA drone program should have been conducted over a more secure government computer system designed to handle classified information.

State Department officials told FBI investigators they communicated via the less-secure system on a few instances, according to congressional and law-enforcement officials. It happened when decisions about imminent strikes had to be relayed fast and the U.S. diplomats in Pakistan or Washington didn’t have ready access to a more-secure system, either because it was night or they were traveling.

Clinton’s reckless disregard for adherence to important government security procedures indicates a fundamental flaw in her ability to serve responsibly, quite apart from her obvious moral and character defects.

Clearly, Hillary Clinton should NOT be trusted with the US nuclear codes and other vital state secrets routinely made available to the president as part of his role as Commander-In-Chief .

Instead, Hillary should be a stay-at-home granny where she can conduct Clinton Foundation rip-offs and fraud on insecure servers and e-mails to her heart’s content, without endangering the lives of 330 million Americans!

Reference 1 LINK

John W. Lillpop
Pine Grove, California

Share Button

One thought on “Can (Should) America Trust Hillary Clinton With US Nuclear Codes, Other Sensitive State Secrets?

  1. Hell, NO. Absolutely no way would I trust Hillary Clinton with anything…most certainly not US Nuclear Codes. Knowing Killery’s background of lies, deceit, thievery, espionage, and criminality, this woman would likely sell the US Nuclear Code to the highest bidder and deposit money in the Clinton Foundation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *