VDARE — “Racial profiling” is legal and the purpose of the government is to enforce the law, including immigration laws. But in Occupied America, a powerful Open Borders Lobby dedicated to replacing the American people regards these obvious truths as controversial and even morally despicable. Luckily, a recent lawsuit designed to sabotage immigration law enforcement has failed. However, the facts surrounding the lawsuit show just how committed agribusinesses are to breaking to the law.
Two Cultural Marxist front groups for illegal aliens, the Farm Labor Organizing Committee (FLOC) and the Immigrant Worker Project, alleged Border Patrol Agents (BPA) were “racially profiling” Hispanics. A judge found no evidence of this allegation.
A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit accusing US border patrol agents who watch over Ohio near the Canadian border of routinely engaging in racial profiling to round up Hispanics.
The judge in Toledo ruled this week that there is no evidence the border patrol along Lake Erie had policies encouraging racial profiling.
US district court judge Jack Zouhary said race did not play a role in the eight encounters with agents cited in the lawsuit.
[US Border Patrol Cleared Of Racially Profiling Hispanics In Ohio, The Guardian, February 26, 2016]
The Treason Lobby lawsuit was premised upon the claim that racial profiling was illegal, which it is not. Even Eric Holder has admitted it in the past.( “Although the use of that information may not be unconstitutional, broad targeting of discrete groups always raises serious fairness concerns.” DOJ Guidance to law enforcement, PDF, December 8, 2014]) But while the judge in this case seemed to know that, the Department of Justice attorney defending the Border Patrol apparently didn’t: